Huolto - Tampere

[beatballs]

Hi all,

Apologies, my finnish is not good enough to ask in finnish just yet I moved from UK last year. We have a giulietta QV which will need new belts, waterpump, oil change, filters etc in the near future. Is there anywhere trustworthy you would recommend in Tampere?

Kiitos

[ArttuNaattor]

Near Tampere, there is a shop in Nokia called Team F40 that are well known for taking care of Alfas and other Italian cars. I haven't heard a bad thing said about them and they mention Alfa Romeo expertise in their website. I would say they are at least one very good option.

https://www.teamf40.fi/huollot/

[Eero]

I recommend strongly https://et-autotech.fi/. It is located in Tampere.

[Jiitee]

I recommend strongly https://et-autotech.fi/. It is located in Tampere.

Me too. Alfa-knowhow is really there.

[beatballs]

That's great - I can avoid going to Delta kiitos kaikille

[FinPat]

That's great - I can avoid going to Delta kiitos kaikille

Yes. Avoid Delta i.e. ex-Lada shop.

[lerppu]

That's great - I can avoid going to Delta kiitos kaikille

Yes. Avoid Delta i.e. ex-Lada shop.

...You don't gotta tell everything - let's ease our foreign friend into our culture! The deep-end can wait. Stuff like "koneliikkeen aikaan" is somewhere way down the line...

[Ammiratore]

Near Tampere, there is a shop in Nokia called Team F40 that are well known for taking care of Alfas and other Italian cars. I haven't heard a bad thing said about them and they mention Alfa Romeo expertise in their website. I would say they are at least one very good option.

https://www.teamf40.fi/huollot/

I used this one for my MiTo QV and they had parts like multiair filter in stock.

[karila]

Tuo noin niin, mitäs jos kuitenkin kirjoitetaan täällä suomeksi. Ihan mukavaa olla kohtelias yhdelle kieltä ymmärtämättömälle, mutta se on toisaalta karhunpalvelus, kielen oppii opiskelemalla ja puhumalla, jos haluaa.

[90]

^

No ketjun aiheesta päätellen on tuskin aikaa odotella kielen oppimista joten omasta puolestani voidaan keskustella myös englanniksi, ei se ole keneltäkään pois, eiköhän se Suomikin ala ajan kanssa luistamaan

[juri]

Tuo noin niin, mitäs jos kuitenkin kirjoitetaan täällä suomeksi. Ihan mukavaa olla kohtelias yhdelle kieltä ymmärtämättömälle, mutta se on toisaalta karhunpalvelus, kielen oppii opiskelemalla ja puhumalla, jos haluaa.

Hieno asenne...

[beatballs]

Near Tampere, there is a shop in Nokia called Team F40 that are well known for taking care of Alfas and other Italian cars. I haven't heard a bad thing said about them and they mention Alfa Romeo expertise in their website. I would say they are at least one very good option.

https://www.teamf40.fi/huollot/

I used this one for my MiTo QV and they had parts like multiair filter in stock.

Ah good, I used to have that engine in giulietta 170 form back in UK, its a great engine and I prefer it to the 1750 in some ways - the multiair filter always gets missed!

Tuo noin niin, mitäs jos kuitenkin kirjoitetaan täällä suomeksi. Ihan mukavaa olla kohtelias yhdelle kieltä ymmärtämättömälle, mutta se on toisaalta karhunpalvelus, kielen oppii opiskelemalla ja puhumalla, jos haluaa.

Olen suomeen kursilla mutta puhun nyt vain vahan, ok kirjoittaa suomeksi, kaikki minun työ on suomeksi


kiitos avusta

[lerppu]

Ah good, I used to have that engine in giulietta 170 form back in UK, its a great engine and I prefer it to the 1750 in some ways - the multiair filter always gets missed!

I got to go offtopic here for a sec… I’ve had the MA Giulietta with a tct. And I’ve had the pleasure of driving the QV (again with the tct) quite often. Now - I fail to see how the MA could be preferrable to the 1750? You might get better mileage, but that’s about it… And with the MA you get the bonus of a glogged breather (atleast in our climate). MiTo was good with the MA, I’ll give you that. But I liked the Giulietta better with a T-JET than an MA. Oh well, I might just be old-skool. I’d prefer a Busso over my current 2.0 MA anyday.

[FinPat]

I’d prefer a Busso over my current 2.0 MA anyday.

Except at the gas pump...

[lerppu]

I’d prefer a Busso over my current 2.0 MA anyday.

Except at the gas pump...

The reason gas prices are so high is because the oil is in Texas and the dipsticks are in Washington.

[beatballs]

Ah good, I used to have that engine in giulietta 170 form back in UK, its a great engine and I prefer it to the 1750 in some ways - the multiair filter always gets missed!

I got to go offtopic here for a sec… I’ve had the MA Giulietta with a tct. And I’ve had the pleasure of driving the QV (again with the tct) quite often. Now - I fail to see how the MA could be preferrable to the 1750? You might get better mileage, but that’s about it… And with the MA you get the bonus of a glogged breather (atleast in our climate). MiTo was good with the MA, I’ll give you that. But I liked the Giulietta better with a T-JET than an MA. Oh well, I might just be old-skool. I’d prefer a Busso over my current 2.0 MA anyday.

The 1750 is a better engine, but I prefer the sound out of the MA, and it was fun to ring it out on the british 'B' roads without getting to illegal speeds, was a manual the one I had (QV now tct).

[lerppu]

Ah good, I used to have that engine in giulietta 170 form back in UK, its a great engine and I prefer it to the 1750 in some ways - the multiair filter always gets missed!

I got to go offtopic here for a sec… I’ve had the MA Giulietta with a tct. And I’ve had the pleasure of driving the QV (again with the tct) quite often. Now - I fail to see how the MA could be preferrable to the 1750? You might get better mileage, but that’s about it… And with the MA you get the bonus of a glogged breather (atleast in our climate). MiTo was good with the MA, I’ll give you that. But I liked the Giulietta better with a T-JET than an MA. Oh well, I might just be old-skool. I’d prefer a Busso over my current 2.0 MA anyday.

The 1750 is a better engine, but I prefer the sound out of the MA, and it was fun to ring it out on the british 'B' roads without getting to illegal speeds, was a manual the one I had (QV now tct).

I had a Giulietta MA with stock exhaust. I found it... - understated. The 1750 has a deeper brawl and a bit of growl under accelleration. Not much, but just enough. I also had a MiTo MA with a Ragazzon cat-back. The sound from it was exciting, almost dirty! If the MA was modified, I can understand where you're coming from. Otherwise my neck is just too red for this level of sophistication!

[beatballs]

I got to go offtopic here for a sec… I’ve had the MA Giulietta with a tct. And I’ve had the pleasure of driving the QV (again with the tct) quite often. Now - I fail to see how the MA could be preferrable to the 1750? You might get better mileage, but that’s about it… And with the MA you get the bonus of a glogged breather (atleast in our climate). MiTo was good with the MA, I’ll give you that. But I liked the Giulietta better with a T-JET than an MA. Oh well, I might just be old-skool. I’d prefer a Busso over my current 2.0 MA anyday.

The 1750 is a better engine, but I prefer the sound out of the MA, and it was fun to ring it out on the british 'B' roads without getting to illegal speeds, was a manual the one I had (QV now tct).

I had a Giulietta MA with stock exhaust. I found it... - understated. The 1750 has a deeper brawl and a bit of growl under accelleration. Not much, but just enough. I also had a MiTo MA with a Ragazzon cat-back. The sound from it was exciting, almost dirty! If the MA was modified, I can understand where you're coming from. Otherwise my neck is just too red for this level of sophistication!

MA reminded me of my teenage years thrashing a 1.2l fiesta around I think yes I heard that system it is pretty fruity for sure